The Connell brothers were getting as close to the big time as they probably will in the early 90s. The Connells were enjoying 15 minutes of fame thanks to 120 Minutes generously playing likable tracks like "Slackjawed" and "'74-'75" from 1993's "Ring" CD. But their full-length follow-up, 1996's "Weird Food & Devastation," which sounds like a title inspired by an unfortunate trip to an unsanitary sushi stand, failed to keep them in the spotlight. I've recently found this one in the bargain bin and decided to investigate why.
It didn't take too many tracks to realize why The Connells could not sustain the success "Ring" had initiated. The record starts to get good around, oh, TRACK 11. What happened, gents? Things get off to a bad start with the pop grunge of "Maybe," which sounds like it was recorded with the same crap R.E.M. used to record their awful sounding "Monster" CD...probably one of the worst distorted guitar tones of all time. Checking out the linear notes, I find Scott Litt (of R.E.M.) mixed that track! If sounding as bad as "Monster" was their goal, they accomplished it.
All is not a loss, though. "Fifth Fret" and "Hang On" are pleasant enough mid-tempo nuggets, and "Back to Blue" is a rather nice ballad. My favorite is the aforementioned "Let It Go" where the Connells' finally sound inspired and their pop genius and complex harmonies are resurrected. But my smile quickly faded as the next track downshifted them into right back into the boring and bland.
iPOD-worthy: 3, 7, 8, 11
The Connells on MySpace. Official site.
2 comments:
One of my all-time favorite bands ... okay, I'm officially liking your blog now. ;-) I consider "WFaD" their worst album by far, but I guess everyone's hit-and-miss. Gosh, how I wish these guys were still around....
-T
Thanks for commenting Tom. I miss the old Connells - never understood why they did not hit it big in late 80s and early 90s.
Post a Comment